"There cannot be collective prosperity 
                                                                              without individual liberty"
                                                                                           - Adam Nardone, publisher

                                                                                                                
UN Religion Losing Traction (Update):
PDF Print E-mail
Global Climate Change



The following is an update to UN Religion Losing Traction, written by Victor Liberti exclusively for ThePlanetBuzz.com

Since the original article was published by The Planet Buzz, there have been significant additional developments debunking the United Nation’s religiouscience of global warming and exposing their high priests and disciples as utter frauds:

In an article published in Canada Free Press in February, former climatology professor
Dr. Tim Ball succinctly reports the true motives behind the existence of the IPCC…

From the Beginning, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was specifically designed by Maurice Strong as a political vehicle to further his objective of crippling the industrialized nations.  As High Priest Al Gore exclaimed, “They Deceived This Country, They Played on Our Fears”:  An acknowledged master of bureaucratic systems he set up every segment of the organization for the maximum public relations effect. This meant emphasis on emotional impact, especially by exploiting fear. The first need was to direct and control the science. It was achieved at the 1985 meeting in Villach Austria chaired by Canadian bureaucrat Gordon McBean with Phil Jones and Tom Wigley from CRU in attendance. The second need was for maximizing the fear factor to force political action… Early stories from the leaked emails identified the obvious illegal and unacceptable activities that do not require understanding of climate science. These related to the work of the CRU members who effectively controlled the chapters on atmospheric chemistry, paleoclimatic reconstruction of past climate conditions, the computer models, and the Summary for Policymakers (SPM).  Their objective was to prove their hypothesis that human CO2 was causing global warming and subsequently climate change. Apart from the SPM all of their work was concentrated in Working Group I (WGI) to produce the Physical Science Basis Report.  

UNIPCC Working Group II Furthered the deceit:  The Physical Science Basis Report was then accepted, without question, by Working Group II (Impacts, Adaptation and Variability) and Working Group III (Mitigation of Climate Change) and became the basis of their research. Working Group II is the Report that has the greatest number of works that are now being exposed as non peer-reviewed and in some instances unpublished. They assume warming is going to occur and the rate will increase. This means that all the studies are focused in a single direction and taken to extremes.  Glaciers will melt rapidly. Sea level will rise quickly. Drought will increase in intensity.  This last argument is an example of how wrong these reports are. Increasing droughts is counterintuitive because with warming evaporation increases putting more moisture in the atmosphere and increasing the precipitation potential:

UNIPCC “Peer-Reviewed Science” a Fraud:  Despite the claims that the religiouscience of Global Warming is based entirely on “peer-reviewed” studies by climate scientists published in scientific journals, it has been discovered through hacked e-mails that a large majority of the studies were not “peer-reviewed”, were not by climate scientists, and the journals were controlled by their own cabal:

One of UNIPCC’s leading climate religiouscientists, Phil Jones, admits there has been no warming since 1995:

Antarctic Sea Ice is not decreasing, but expanding:  Contrary to UNIPCC claims, Antarctic sea ice is not decreasing but actually increasing and expanding, running contrary to UNIPCC Global Warming theory:

Study claiming Rain Forests shrinking due to Global Warming was a sham:

UNIPCC Misled the World Over Himalayan Glaciers:

The climate dataset of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) was considered — by the top climate scientists within NASA itself — to be inferior to the now debunked data maintained by the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU):

UNIPCC Scientist Admits Sea Levels not rising, calling it, “The Greatest Lie Ever Told”:

UNIPCC Claims that increased wildfires brought about by Global Warming hurt Canadian Tourism were not only bogus, but those UN reviewers possessing a conscience warned against including claims in report:

Another false “Peer Reviewed” study blaming Global Warming for increased California Mudslides:

Revelations of Deceit Fail to Influence the Disciples on their Religiouscience:
Incredibly, the disciples and faithful of the religiouscience of Global Warming have increasingly ignored criticisms and exposure of the deception instead believing their high priests as they double down on deceit as evidenced by recent Al Gore statements and Opinion Editorials being published in the media, for example, a February 15, 2010 OP-Ed in the Boston Globe, Climate Changes are a Proven Fact, by high priest Kerry Emanuel:

Kerry Emanuel’s piece was then thoroughly and systematically debunked by Climate Scientist Bill Gray:

The evidence continues to mount that those engaged in perpetrating the hoax of global warming are not scientists, but rather extreme left political activists intent on destroying the industrialized nations of the world.  All legitimate scientists believe there is woefully insufficient data and research to indicate, much less prove, the existence of so-called Anthropogenic Global Warming.  It is the non-scientist politicians, like the discredited head of the UNIPCC Puchari, who continue to push their religiouscience upon the world.  As with any false religion, its leaders and followers will yell and scream to defend it, particularly in this case given the tremendous amount of financial graft at stake.  However, those who believe in the truth must continue to seek it through real science and the scientific method, never being intimidated by such preposterous claims that the science is “settled” or that the debate is “over”, two tell-tale signs of fraud.