"There cannot be collective prosperity 
                                                                              without individual liberty"
                                                                                           - Adam Nardone, publisher

                                                                                                                
Copenhagen Climate Summit Ends With “Toothless” Deal
Written by Adam Nardone
PDF Print E-mail
Global Climate Change



A chaotic and acrimonious end to the recent Climate Summit in Copenhagen will force leading nations to reconvene again, earlier than anticipated. 

After intense, eleventh-hour wrangling, delegates from 192 nations passed a motion simply noting a loose deal aimed at limiting global temperature rises to less than 2 degrees C, which was agreed to by the United States and four other developed nations.  This “Copenhagen Accord” led by the US, China, India, Brazil and South Africa, had numerous holes in it, lacked any timetable and was not legally binding.

Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary-General, said: "It may not be everything we hoped for, but this decision of the Conference of Parties is an essential beginning. We must transform this into a legally binding treaty next year."

This is mostly positive news from a summit that had the potential of sinking a world economic crisis into greater depths.  The fact that little, if anything was accomplished at this bogus conference is credited to the hackers who uncovered the rather unscientific methods used by the climate scientists/social engineers charged with orchestrating the Great Climate Hoax of the 21st Century.  It is becoming increasingly evident that we have the Russians to thank for obtaining and publishing the thousands of e-mails from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich, East England.  This is the research unit that is supplying the United Nation’s IPCC the preponderance of its climate change information. 

 Another climate research unit, the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon, England), is at the center of the Russian’s motive to unveil the Great Climate Hoax.  The Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Center had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.  The IEA believes that Russian meteorological-station data did not substantiate the anthropogenic global-warming theory. Analysts say Russian meteorological stations cover most of the country’s territory, and that the Hadley Center had used data submitted by only 25% of such stations in its reports. Over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature calculations for some other reasons, rather than the lack of meteorological stations and observations. 
The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early 21st century.

The HadCRUT database includes specific stations providing incomplete data and highlighting the global-warming process, rather than stations facilitating uninterrupted observations.

On the whole, climatologists use the incomplete findings of meteorological stations far more often than those providing complete observations.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.

The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world’s land mass. The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.

Global-temperature data will have to be modified if similar climate-date procedures have been used from other national data because the calculations used by Copenhagen Summit (COP15) analysts, including financial calculations, are based on HadCRUT research.
What the Russians are suggesting here, in other words, is that the entire global temperature record used by the IPCC to inform world government policy is pure science fiction.

Still, the eventual beneficiaries of the massive wealth transfer that is The Great Climate Hoax are unwavering.  Lumumba Stanislaus Di-Aping, the Sudanese negotiator, said the Copenhagen accord spelt "incineration" for Africa and compared it to the Nazis sending "6 million people into furnaces" in the Holocaust.  Imagine in your wildest dreams, a wealth transfer agreement in the name of a global climate “crisis” based on incomplete and concocted data by pseudo-scientists on government payrolls.  Now imagine a failed first attempt at ratifying such an agreement being compared to the Holocaust.  This should tell you all you need to know about the lengths the climate change zealots will go to achieve their goal of confiscating the wealth of United States citizens.

In another dramatic twist, imagine you are back in the era of the Cold War.  Would you ever believe that the Russians and the Chinese would be the two nations leading the charge against world Socialism?   Even Stalin and Mao couldn’t concoct a more diabolical plan for world domination than what the Great Climate Hoaxers are implementing.